Security is strong inside systems. It breaks the moment data moves beyond them.
Identify and classify sensitive data across systems.
Govern who can reach what.
Encryption at the object level, not the perimeter.
Revoke, audit, and enforce after sharing.
The tools in your stack were designed to solve real problems. They solve them. What they weren't designed to do is follow data out the door, and that's exactly where protection fails.
Confidencial doesn't add another monitoring layer. It adds the one thing the rest of the stack was never designed to provide: cryptographic protection embedded in the data itself, enforceable wherever it travels, revocable after it leaves.
The lock detaches at every boundary.
The lock stays attached through all four moments.
Data-level security eliminates the tech debt of point tools that don't talk to each other. Confidencial replaces data rooms, file transfer, e-sign, and AI governance bolt-ons, while complementing the DLP and DSPM investments you've already made.
Confidencial also complements your existing investments in DLP, DSPM, and identity providers.
Train and run models without leaking PHI, trade secrets, or customer data. Governed access and traceability for models, users, and partners — none of them see what they shouldn't.
Data stays encrypted even after exfiltration. Insider and third-party access governed at the file level, not the folder level. A breach becomes a non-event.
Consolidate data rooms, file transfer, e-sign, and AI governance into one contract. Eliminate overlapping vendor coverage where Confidencial's scope makes them redundant.
Bad actors move faster than the tools built to detect them. The only durable answer is protection that doesn't depend on stopping the attack, it makes the data worthless when they get through.