Source code. Product roadmaps. Customer data. Model weights. Proprietary algorithms. Every file that defines your competitive position moves constantly. To contractors, integration partners, enterprise buyers, AI systems, and cloud infrastructure. The moment any of it crosses your organizational boundary, your governance stops. Confidencial embeds persistent protection into the data itself, so demonstrable controls travel with every file, not just with the systems it passes through.
Technology companies build sophisticated security around data that moves constantly. At every handoff, location-based protection stays behind. The data is on its own.
One compromised credential gives an authenticated attacker full access to everything they can reach. In a technology company, that means source code repositories, customer PII, model weights, API credentials, and proprietary algorithms, all exposed in a single authenticated session. IAM did its job. The attacker bypassed it. Everything behind that credential is now accessible.
These aren't edge cases. A single product build might involve source code across a dozen contractor environments, customer data flowing through AI copilots, and roadmap documents shared with enterprise design partners- none of it protected after it leaves your systems.
An attacker bypasses SSO, or acquires a compromised credential. Everything the user could reach is now accessible: source code repositories, customer PII, model weights, API credentials, and product roadmaps. The session looks legitimate. No alert fires.
A contractor, integration partner, or technology vendor you shared files with is compromised. Attackers exfiltrate everything on their system, including source code, customer data, and product files you shared with them legitimately, appropriately, under contract.
An enterprise buyer's security team asks: what happens to our data after it leaves your platform? You point to a DPA and a perimeter log. They open a ticket, route it to three reviewers, and the deal stalls for six weeks. Confidencial gives you a cryptographic audit trail that follows the data through your system, through every integration hop, producible on demand.
A permission model is not a governance strategy.
A download is all it takes.
Not the system. Not the perimeter. The file itself — from creation through AI ingestion.
Each product picks up where your existing stack stops. Deploy individually
or together across your environment.
Protect customer PII, source code, and sensitive data as it moves through your platform workflows, API integrations, and delivery pipelines. Every data object is protected at the moment of movement. Field-level governance without re-architecting your stack.
Sensitive customer data classified and protected before it enters a model's context window — for RAG, fine-tuning, summarization, or agentic workflows. When a developer pastes a data file into an AI coding tool, protected fields return nothing usable. The model only sees what it should.
Discover, classify, and protect sensitive customer data across cloud, on-prem, and hybrid platform environments. From TB to PB, data lakes, vector databases, and application storage are protected at rest and in motion.
Protected file and data exchange for enterprise buyer and partner workflows. Every delivery is encrypted client-side, tracked end-to-end, and revocable after delivery. The chain of custody extends beyond your platform boundary.
Protected data environments for enterprise buyer onboarding, compliance reviews, and partner due diligence workflows. Every document carries its own access policy.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA, and your largest enterprise customers' security teams are all moving in the same direction: verifiable chain of custody, field-level encryption that persists through third-party environments, and documented controls that follow data after it leaves your systems. Perimeter logs don't satisfy enterprise security review requirements.
"Failure to encrypt" and "inadequate third-party controls" are cited in enterprise vendor risk reviews and breach litigation. The companies that can demonstrate provable, documented protection, with an audit trail that survives every contractor and vendor handoff, have a credible answer in procurement, customer security questionnaires, and discovery.
Yes. Confidencial operates at the content layer, below your existing systems. Development platforms, SaaS tools, and engineering workflows operate exactly as they do today. No workflow changes, no retraining. Protection is applied when files are created or shared, and travels with the file into any environment it reaches.
DLP catches accidental exfiltration, unauthorized sends, blocked uploads, flagged transfers. Technology company risk is authorized, intentional sharing: contractors, integration partners, enterprise buyers, AI vendors. DLP has no visibility or control once an authorized user shares an authorized file to an authorized recipient. That's the entire tech workflow. Confidencial is the layer that activates precisely where DLP stops.
Protected files return nothing usable to an unauthorized AI process. Customer PII, source code, and proprietary model logic are encrypted before they reach the model. The protection is cryptographic. It doesn't depend on developer awareness or behavior change. Depending on the data, this also closes CCPA, GDPR, and enterprise DPA obligations.
An authenticated attacker reaches files they cannot open. Protection is embedded in the file itself, not dependent on access controls that the attacker has already bypassed. The incident scope drops from "everything accessible" to "everything decryptable without our keys." That's the difference between a business crisis and a contained event.
Enterprise procurement standards and your largest customers' security teams increasingly require demonstrable controls, not policy attestations. Confidencial's access log is the chain of custody evidence: generated automatically, producible on demand for any security review or customer audit. Cryptographic proof of what happened to data, when, and in which environment — across every contractor and vendor hop.
No. Protection is embedded in the file at the organizational level before it leaves. Contractors and vendors work with the files exactly as they do today. The protection is architectural. It doesn't depend on recipient infrastructure, IT cooperation, or behavior change.
"What happens to our data after it leaves your system?" is now standard in enterprise procurement reviews. If your answer is a policy document, a DPA, or a SOC2 report, the review slows down. We'll show you exactly where your data governance stops, and what the architectural answer looks like.
Book a demo