If you have BigID, Confidencial closes the enforcement gap it can't. If you don't, Confidencial replaces it — and protects the data it finds.
Either way works. The question is how much integration overhead you want to carry.
BigID classifies your sensitive data. Confidencial encrypts it, controls where it goes, and protects it through AI pipelines. The two connect via policy rules with no manual handoff.
Confidencial Discover finds and classifies sensitive data. Shield applies persistent protection. AI Guard governs AI pipelines. One platform, one audit log, one vendor contract.
Classification tells you where the risk is. It doesn't close it. Once a file is flagged, it's still readable, until Confidencial acts on it.
| Capability | BigID alone | Confidencial alone |
|---|---|---|
| Data Discovery & Classification | ||
| Privacy Compliance | ||
| Risk Identification & Tagging | ||
| Remediation & Protection | ||
| Granular Protection | ||
| Persistent Protection | ||
| Secure Sharing Controls | ||
| AI Data Governance | ||
| Data-Centric Zero Trust | ||
| Data-Blind Architecture |
Classification tells you what's at risk. Confidencial makes that risk irrelevant, because even if a file gets out, the sensitive content inside it is unreadable.
See how Confidencial handles the enforcement half of your data security stack, or the whole thing.